Global Research, September 23, 2025

Since the publication of the “Project for the New American Century” in 1997, the USA has been striving to dominate the world.
Two important issues to be addressed:
1. It is unlikely that the preparations for the 9/11 attacks were carried out under the surveillance of American intelligence services,
2. Danish scientists found particles of the explosive nano thermite — produced by the U.S. military—in the dust from the World Trade Center
After occupying oil-rich Iraq and toppling the government in oil-abundant Libya, the US government turned its focus to Iran, which, however, Russia and China were willing to defend even at the cost of a world war. The fact that Iran had one of the most democratic Muslim governments was entirely secondary to the US government in its desire to dominate the world.
A new hope for achieving its goal emerged for the US government when demonstrators from Western Ukraine prevailed on Kyiv’s Maidan and overthrew the pro-Russian government of Viktor Yanukovych. With the loss of Ukraine, Russia was losing its status as a world power. Eastern and Western Ukraine had fought against each other in both the First and Second World Wars, and with the overthrow of the pro-Russian government, they came into conflict again. Russia supported the Eastern Ukrainian rebels who revolted against Ukraine’s orientation towards the EU and NATO, and thus against the weakening of its power.
Because the USA had not the slightest intention of giving up the chance to dominate the world, this civil war escalated into a world war over Ukraine. The NATO member states sided with the USA, and China sided with Russia. The US government realizes that China, thanks to its economic and technological growth, is becoming its serious competitor in the struggle for global power, and China, in turn, is aware that if Russia loses its status as a world power, it will lose a significant military ally in the fight for global power with the USA.
When Donald Trump became the American president, he decided to attempt to use the USA’s current position in the world to definitively dominate it. Among other things, he immediately showed what American global governance would look like if the USA were to definitively control the world, and he attempted to significantly enrich the American government by imposing high tariffs on imports of goods from other countries. This money could have been used to further build up the American military, which would have further solidified American global dominance.
However, for the time being, Donald Trump was aware that even in conjunction with the EU, the USA does not have superiority over the alliance of Russia and China in a conventional war. He therefore attempted to bring Russia to his side by allowing it to take over the part of Ukraine that was identified with Russia. At the same time, he tried to maneuver so as not to lose the alliance of the European Union, which, conversely, sees its growth solely in advancing eastward through Ukraine further into Eastern Europe and into Asia all the way to the Chinese border. The EU’s goal is to eventually, with its area and population, become an almost equal world power capable of competing with the USA, China, and India.
At the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the American effort to dominate the world suffered a serious crack. Not only did Russia and China meet there, but also India, which perceived—just like Russia and China—the threat posed by an aggressive NATO fighting in Ukraine to gain new territories that were never historically part of the West.
.

Narendra Modi with Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping at the SCO Summit in Tianjin (GODL-India)
Therefore, India refused to stop importing Russian oil, even though the US imposed 50 percent tariffs on its goods. Consequently, Russia can continue its war in Ukraine because it can supply oil to nearly half of the world’s population, while the US cannot rely on preventing China and India from importing Russian oil and natural gas. Their tariff policy, after all, could lead to them losing nearly half of the world market for their goods. Thus, the war in Ukraine continues to define a new division of the world.
A significant role is also played by the fact that Russia, China, and even India, are multinational states. They cannot introduce full democracy without disintegrating into smaller states and thus ceasing to be great powers capable of competing with NATO. Given the current strength of the Russia-China-India grouping, neither NATO nor the USA has a chance to dominate the entire world.
In the ongoing struggle for world domination, the most populous countries with the largest internal markets—China and India—will logically become the strongest economies in the long term. It can be expected that they will gradually gain military superiority in the world as well. If a competitive struggle eventually breaks out between them, it will once again, as it does today, threaten a destructive world war.
So-called defenders of democracy should consider whether they want a globalized world dominated by a single superpower that will use its power for its own benefit, or a democratic world governed by a democratic UN. This UN would stop the endless power wars by having a majority vote of its member states decide whether a country is considered an aggressor. The states that voted against the aggressor would then send their armies against it. In such a case, neither China nor India would be able to use their population advantage to dominate the world in the long run. Moreover, democracy would function as a global model for the execution of state power and would therefore be gradually adopted by non-democratic states as well.
Currently, information about a serious threat to democracy by neurotechnologies, that allow for the remote control of human brain activity, is being suppressed worldwide. Against the danger that those technologies may be abused warns even the United Nations Organisation. The fact that people today can only learn about these technologies and the danger they pose to democracy and human rights only from pro-Russian news sites is evidence of the loss of respect for democracy by governments that claim to uphold it. Already in 1994 the Strategic Studies Institute at the American War College wrote:
“Potential or possible supporters of the insurgency around the world were identified using the comprehensive Interagency Integrated Database. These were categorized as ‘potential’ or ‘active’, with sophisticated personality simulations used to develop, tailor and focus psychological campaigns for each“ (pg. 24 – 25).
Virtually all world governments are currently working on technologies for the remote control of human brain activity using energy fields. The principle of this technology is that if physical fields are transmitted into the brain at the frequencies of the human nervous system’s electrical activity, they are capable of artificially inducing any activity within it, including thoughts, feelings, emotions, and the function of internal organs.
Furthermore, world powers are approaching the ability to control the brain activity of people across the entire planet using this method. That is, the comprehensive control of the behavior of human beings worldwide. In this way, the globalization of the world and totalitarian rule over it could be completed, if one of the world powers gains control Russia, China, and the USA already have radar systems capable of producing electromagnetic waves in the ionosphere at the frequencies at which the human nervous system operates, thereby controlling human thought and behavior across large areas of the planet.
Mobile telephone systems, electrical power grids, and satellites can be used for the same purpose, as well as the internet, if the connection between human brains and computers and mobile phones is achieved, as is currently planned for the sixth generation of mobile communication (6G).
The only reliable guarantor of enforcing a ban on the use of remote human brain control technologies could, once again, only be a democratic United Nations.
If democratic superpowers have a sincere interest in promoting the development of global democracy, and not just their own power, they should currently offer Russia and China, who promote a multipolar world, participation in a world where the struggle for power is halted by the creation of a democratic UN, within which NATO would also be dissolved. After several decades of a functioning democratic UN system, even Russia, China, and India could cease to fear being dominated by another superpower and could potentially break apart, thereby strengthening global democracy.
Support the Creation of a Democratic United Nations Organization
A Petition to the Governments of the United States of America, the Russian Federation, the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of India, and the European Union
The war in Ukraine is currently reaching its peak. This war is part of a larger struggle to gain power over the entire world. If a single state emerges victorious in this war, or in any other future war between the world’s greatest powers for global domination, all inhabitants of this planet will become dependent on the decisions made by its leading politicians. These leaders will strive to benefit the citizens of their own state above all others. The inhabitants of other states will lose the ability to participate in decisions about the future development of civilization, which will produce a totalitarian system of world government. In the event of global crises, the decisions of the ruling state will be turned against the inhabitants of the rest of the world if it is deemed useful for the successful survival of its own citizens.
With the development of artificial intelligence and advanced neuro-technologies, there is an acute danger that the victorious power will begin to exert its control by remotely manipulating the activity of human brains across the entire planet. If you want the inhabitants of this planet to have the opportunity to jointly decide on the future development of this civilization and to freely use their own brains to make decisions about their lives and matters of public interest, you should agree to the creation of a democratic UN. In this body, decisions on any interventions against aggressive states would be made by a majority vote of its member states.
If you continue the struggle for power over the world, you will inevitably reach a point where global domination could only be decided by a world war that would destroy it. If one power uses technologies to control the brains of the majority of citizens of another power, or of the entire planet, to win the power struggle, other powers will have no other means of defense than to respond with a nuclear strike.
It is currently within your power to show your respect for everything humanity has built by understanding that the continued struggle for control of this world threatens thousands of years of development of our current civilization. It is high time that you agree with the other major powers and UN member states to create a democratic UN without veto power for the world powers. This would demonstrate your respect for human life and the freedom of the inhabitants of this planet, and for the general preservation of their fundamental human rights, including the right to life.
We therefore ask you to begin orienting your policies toward a democratic United Nations Organization and to stop the struggle for world domination.
*
Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.
Mojmir Babacek was born in 1947 in Prague, Czech Republic. Graduated in 1972 at Charles University in Prague in philosophy and political economy. In 1978 signed the document defending human rights in communist Czechoslovakia „Charter 77“. Since 1981 until 1988 lived in emigration in the USA. Since 1996 he has published articles on different subjects mostly in the Czech and international alternative media.
In 2010, he published a book on the 9/11 attacks in the Czech language. Since the 1990‘s he has been striving to help to achieve the international ban of remote control of the activity of the human nervous system and human minds with the use of neurotechnology.
Featured image is from edgarwinkler / Pixabay

Leave a Reply